I know, I know, Joe Cocker died last year, December 22 2014, I think; but I was looking through some old stuff and I found this piece which I wrote 20 YEARS AGO. And I still agree with myself. So consider this a late farewell to a remarkable talent.
YOU ARE STILL
BEAUTIFUL, JOE
In 1972 I had
no faith; I returned my ticket and got a refund because they said Joe Cocker
was being deported, the concert was off. In the end, of course, the concert
went ahead, but I and my equally craven friends missed out. In 1995 it was
therefore important to go to hear Joe. I know, he’s been in town a couple of
times since 1972, but it didn’t seem to matter as much as now. I teeter on the
threshold of 40, and reminders of my youth are so much more poignant than they
were 10 years ago.
So I paid my
$47 plus booking fee for my ticket- I could have had it for $12 in 1972, but
that’s the price you pay for not standing firm, and they say that the
almost-cancelled concert was his best ever, too- and waited impatiently for the
Big Night. I discovered all sorts of unsuspected Cocker fans who were going to
be there, or wished they could be there, or would have gone with me had I told
them about it etc; there was a lot of interest.
I’m glad I
didn’t read the nasty little review in the Age, not that I would have missed
out again. Yes, he’s old, grey, balding, fat, ugly and twitchy; OK, he can’t
hit the top notes, not that he ever really could; but the raw truth of the
voice is there, and now that he’s been around so long, you can really believe
him. To sing a song for 25 years and still sound like he means it is an
achievement. So excited because his baby wrote him a letter! So in need of a
little help from his friends! And plenty of new stuff too, big production
numbers, simple solos, a great concert, and all the fans were happy. So there,
mean little whippersnapper of a critic, I bet nobody will be looking up your
newspaper pieces 25 years from now.
As I tell my
bemused children during our rock appreciation lessons, usually conducted in the
car while listening to a CD, the thing about Joe Cocker is that he has no ego.
When, say, Tom Jones or Mick Jagger, or young Axl Rose, for that matter, sing,
there is a strong sense of self-parody. There is always the feeling of ‘Here I
am , singing this song! Aren’t I fabulous? What a presence!’, a
self-consciousness which comes through especially in live performance. Not so
with Joe. He opens his throat and lets the raw emotion, the anguish, the love,
the despair, just pulse out; he is the song. He always was, whether drunk or
drugged or swigging Evian, it made no difference. He didn’t even write the
songs; he took them from others and made them his own. He grimaces, he
twitches, he’s awful to watch. He doesn’t bop or hop or wiggle his butt, he
just stands there awkwardly, a bit shyly, and SINGS. He’s got the best
‘AAAARRGH!’ in Rock history, he has a voice like sandpaper and gravel, and he
sounds like he really, really means every word, even if you can’t quite make
out some of them.
Joe, you are
still beautiful to me.
Shyrla Pakula
22/10/95
No comments:
Post a Comment