I love the Tour de France; it would have to be the
craziest, most gruelling event in the sporting calendar, and the most telegenic.
It is riveting to watch and wonderful to listen to, with the calm and erudite
commentary of Phil Liggett and Paul Sherwen. To think of what these athletes
must suffer as they travel day after day for 3 weeks, time trials and all, in
boiling heat, rain, cold; through the Pyrenees and the Alps, the insane ascents
and the even more mad and dangerous descents, riding 90km/hour down the
mountains, protected by nothing but skin tight nylon and a dinky helmet; one
wrong move and it’s kaput. The dangerous peloton with the jockeying for space,
the attacks, the breakaways, the sheer courage and strength and stamina, it’s
awesome. I always want to slap the
overexcited spectators for getting in the way, on more than one occasion
causing riders to crash, not to mention the one time a dog ran across the road
and the riders went down like dominoes.
So considering how difficult this event is and how
competitive are the road cyclists, and how crazy the Europeans, in particular,
are about road cycling, well, it shouldn’t come as a surprise to learn that
there are those who use performance-enhancing drugs to get the winning edge.
And considering the fact that Lance Armstrong won the Tour 7 times, which is
also impossible, I shouldn’t be surprised to hear that he was one of the drug
cheats. So I’m not surprised. But I am heartbroken.
Because Lance was always more than just a jock.
Lance was a legend. And when you look at the story, well, yes, it did seem too
good to be true. And it was.
When I read his first book, ‘It’s not about the
bike’ I was moved by his story- alienated from is father, raised by his single
mother, struck down by testicular cancer which spread to his bones and brain,
undergoing surgery and searching for an oncologist who believed in him enough
to try different chemotherapy, looking for a cure when popular medical opinion
had given up- and the photos of Lance at his sickest, a bald,walking, scarred
skeleton. It was an extreme sort of story of an extreme sort of person. A
person who, frankly, came across as an asshole, but one you had to admire for
his strength of purpose and resilience. Easy to admire, hard to like.
I believed that the chemo had remade him into
something more than human, a physical freak. I didn’t dream that a person with
this sort of medical history and this sort of ferocity and dedication to
living, would take performance-enhancing drugs. HGH (growth hormone) could have
easily triggered any residual tumour growth. Testosterone- in a person with one
testicle? Couldn’t that cause it to atrophy? EPO- well, I don’t know that EPO
would have damaged him, but still, I naively thought, along with millions, that
he would not be so reckless as to take these drugs. So we are all dupes. And
there is also now this whisper that, since he was doping before the cancer
diagnosis, could the drugs have actually triggered the cancer? (I don’t know
enough to comment, but I think probably not, or else there would be heaps more
athletes with cancer, no?)
What’s also so awful is the cover-up, involving
bullying and intimidation of other riders and apparently, his wife at the time.
So he was even a bigger jerk than I had originally thought.
But he is still a great athlete, and so are all
the other drug cheats. Landis and Leipheimer and Contadore and all the guys
that got caught, and so many who weren’t. They are all great athletes, but they
succumbed to the ethos of ‘Cheat or be cheated.’ They made a wrong choice. And
now we scorn them.
And the ‘Livestrong’ foundation and those sexy
yellow bracelets (which unfortunately spawned dozens of other bracelets so the
meaning was kind of lost) and the millions of dollars raised for cancer
research- should we scorn that too?
I won’t stop watching the Tour, and I hope Phil
Liggett won’t stop commentating, although he must be devastated beyond all
measure, as he was Armstrong’s most staunch defender. I want to think that this
upheaval will shake out all the cheating athletes and doctors but I fear it
won’t. They talk now about ‘the Armstrong years’ as if those were the worst
years of doping, but were they? Is it better now? Who really knows?
So Lance couldn’t be a role model; then let him be
a terrible cautionary tale. Disgraced, stripped of his victories and
sponsorships, a fraud. A great athlete whose arrogance and hubris led to his downfall;
the legend has become a cliché.
Cadell Evans better be as clean as they all say he
is, or I don’t know what I will do. There’s only so much disappointment I can
endure.
Doctor Booba,
ReplyDeleteEPO as you know increases red blood cell count and therefore thickens the blood which leads to heart issues. As it is hard to detect/easy to conceal think of all the athletes who have died young from heart disease which everyone always attributes to a "rare congenital heart condition". Bollocks.
Or arrhythmias... not all young athletes die of doping related disease...but maybe i am still being naive.
DeleteBut you are right, it's heartbreaking more to hear that he was a bully and the centre of the scandal who has now taken down many other athletes and their livelihoods with him.
ReplyDeleteSo now I don't feel bad that he is getting the stick, I feel sorry for the others he roped in.
Interestingly, the only ones not affected by the fall out are the cyclists that were still crap even after they doped, no-one cares and they still keep their jobs, suddenly when they are an icon or a good cyclist everyone stands ten feet away.
It's the great athlete bit that gets lost in the story. Yes, they were all cheats and we were all duped, but they only cheated to get ahead and started out much better than the average cyclist. Despite this sorry tale, Lance still overcame cancer and still competed in seven gruelling races. Would he have won without the drugs? Who knows, but as you say, even to compete in these races and to be competitive in them is a great feat and that at least is what he should be remembered for given his background and struggles. Plus, there's no denying his ability to raise millions for charity...
ReplyDeleteIt's made so much worse by the lies and the cover-ups and the bullying, and the TWO motivational books which are, if not full of lies, are full of deceit. It is heartbreaking.
ReplyDeleteIt's a blight on the entire sport. If a small number of participants used drugs to get an advantage, that's one thing. But if most of them do, what does it say about endurance cycling as a sport?
ReplyDeleteWell, what does it say about weightlifters? or anyone looking for the edge? It says that it's hard to be an elite athlete, and if there is no moral compass there, or if there is enough intimidation, then bad choices are made by people who love the sport and want to excel. A part of me always jokes that, to be in the tour, sitting on a bike for weeks, you would have to be on some sort of drugs or else be insane, but seriously, it can all be scaled back if a true sincere concerted effort can be made at all levels of admin, participation etc. There needs to be an amnesty and a fresh start. It's doable but is it probable? I would also kick out all the doctors involved, not too hard to find out who, and ban them for life from anything to do with sport, and deregister them too.
ReplyDelete